Friday, September 30, 2005

Trane's Gospel

You knew that if you didn’t stay on top of the beat
the beat would have its way with you.
Your prayer of music wouldn’t be as sincere
if you had followed someone else’s prayer.

Your sound, almost indecipherable
but we can hear your unrelenting effort, your patience
carved as a psalm for us, right now
transcending our pettiness and frailty
making us think that we can be better than what we are
because we can hear your music.
Yes, we can hear your music. Thank God.


..


From Ken Burns’ Jazz Documentary:

Music for many people has been an avenue to the spiritual life we all manifest in some fashion or another. With the possible exception of Ellington, no other musician has embraced that spirituality quite so positively, quite so confidently, quite so powerfully as saxophonist John Coltrane. "The thing that's always in John Coltrane," Marsalis told us, "is the lyrical shout of the preacher in the heat and full fury of attempting to transform the congregation." In 1964, Coltrane made one of the best-selling jazz albums of the decade and one of the most influential records of all time: the four-part devotional suite A Love Supreme.

In 1966, someone asked him what his plans were for the next decade.

"To try to become a saint," he replied.


Link: John Coltrane’s Biography



Monday, September 26, 2005

Earth's Gravity

When I was a kid, I thought that Earth's gravity was caused by its spinning molten core, like an electric magnet spinning to generate gravity. The real answer is gravity is caused by the MASS of an object; the larger the mass of the object, the greater the force of its gravity. Even we humans have our own gravity fields!

More info:
Quickie Questions - Extraordinary Earth - Gravity/Magnetism

Really cool additional info on new discoveries in gravity as well as quantum physics:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html

What exactly is the mass of an object? Mass is sometimes mistaken for the weight of an object (and sometimes mass is the same as the weight of an object), but here's the real answer:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass



Saturday, September 24, 2005

God, Love and the Potential of Atoms

My friends and I have had this ongoing discussion for years. It’s about how God, Love, and Atoms are tied together.

We would talk about God. What is God? Why is God everywhere? Why does God control everything? Why does God make everything happen?

As a Catholic kid, I was taught that God is this “Being That One Does Not Mess With”. If you did good things, God rewards you with good stuff or good times. If you did bad things, you were punished. God was supposed to be everywhere, within everybody, but you still had to go to a church to formally talk to God. As if church had better reception. This separation from God kinda confused me growing up.

As I got older and the hormones kicked in, I paid more attention to Love; mostly the urge-induced Romantic Love that’s talked about in poetry and Top-40 songs. As I got older still, I wanted to learn more about Universal Love, and if Romantic Love was a subset of Universal Love, or if the two were separate entities.

And if Universal Love and Romantic Love were separate, does this mean that priests (the no-touchy good ones) don’t really get a complete taste of life, since they’re only getting to feel Universal Love and not Romantic Love? And are priests, because they’re not able to experience Romantic Love, able to experience a really intense God Love, the kind that only holy people can experience? And if so, does this mean that regular non-clergy people like you and me are missing out on the really intense God Love?

Regardless of the categorization, somebody’s missing out on something. Somebody’s not getting the full God treatment.

Now, atoms. Atoms are everywhere, including space. I used to think that because they call it “space” that it’s empty. But here’s an explanation:

Density of Outer Space
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/DaWeiCai.shtml

So space does contain atoms, unpaired hydrogen atoms. This means that atoms are everywhere, including space.

But then I saw this movie called Mindwalk, and it mentioned that each atom is composed mostly of empty space:

Sonya: What's an atom? Well, Newton thought it was small solid particles. But that's not what scientists saw when they observed atoms for the first time. What they saw was totally unexpected and shocking.

Jack: You mean they saw that an atom was made of even smaller particles -- a nucleus with electrons whirling around it.

Sonya: Not only that. They were moving in relatively vast regions of empty space! That's what shook the scientists up. Atoms consist mainly of empty space...

The movie goes on to say that if a single atom was the size of a small island, the nucleus would be the size of a small pebble. And the electrons would be even smaller.

Imagine an island with an itty bitty little pebble in the middle of it and a few smaller pebbles scattered along its shore. So what’s taking up all that space in between the little particles inside an atom?

Nobody can confirm this yet, but some say it’s made up of energy, or potential. Nobody has been able to measure it, identify it, or “see” it with any instruments.

What if God is this energy?

Since atoms are everywhere, and all that space inside atoms are everywhere, why couldn’t God be that energy that gives atoms their potential? Why couldn’t God be that energy that really makes things happen?

And as much as we humans try to control the universe, we know that ultimately we are at the mercy of the Bigger Picture. Of God. Of this energy inside everything. Do we fight it, or acknowledge its existence to live in concert with it?

And this potential, this energy, is this where Love comes from? The unexplainable force that binds each atom together, so that the nucleus, electrons and other itty bitty particles inside dance harmoniously with each other. The unexplainable force that attracts atoms to other atoms so that they become molecules, that attracts molecules to other molecules, and so on.

And if Love is attraction, what better model than the atom? Do we all feel the same Universal Love, or do some of us feel more Love than others, or feel a different kind of Love? In terms of rationing out Love, is anyone really left out? Do we all, equally, have access to all the Love in the universe, except in our limited minds?

Is there really a difference between God, Love and the potential of atoms?


..


Related links:

Mindwalk
The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene



Friday, September 23, 2005

The Four Noble Truths and why YOUR LIFE SUCKS!

Disclaimer: this is my blog, my interpretation. I suggest you read what others have written about the Four Noble Truths. With that being said, let’s go.

A friend of mine asked me about the phrase “Life is suffering”. You’ve probably heard this phrase said in movies or from friends during yoga class. “Life is suffering” is like the slogan for Buddhism, similar to “Just do it” is the slogan for Nike. My friend asked, “If life is suffering, does that mean as long as we are alive we are suffering?”

This is how I replied. The phrase “Life is suffering” is the short version of The Four Noble Truths (I’ll talk about this later in this entry). Because we live in a fast-paced society with no time to really delve deeply into the meaning of things, somebody, probably a monk in Santa Monica during a quick sushi lunch, once mumbled “Life is suffering” to describe Buddhism to his friend, and the phrase stuck. It’s like Zen or Feng Shui. Everybody likes to use these words but very few really know what they mean. “Life is suffering” suffers from the same abbreviated misunderstanding.

This is what I think “Life is suffering” really means:

A great many of the things that we cling to actually cause us to suffer, either immediately or in the long run. For example, that car that we really really want, even though we can’t really afford it; because we want that car and we don’t have it, that longing and not getting, hurts. And that’s suffering. The more we think about not getting it, the more it hurts. Think of how many things you can’t have or afford. Think of how often you think about the things you can’t have or afford. Think of how often you daydream about the things that you can’t have or afford. Think of how often you see other people who have what you want, and how you envy those people (the seemingly rich guy, the woman with the seemingly perfect body, the seemingly happy couple, the seemingly happy kids playing in front of the nice big house). Think of how you feel when you think about all these things.

And you don’t have it.

Haha, neener neener on you. You suck. What a loser.

You probably don’t feel good. You probably feel bad. And that’s suffering. The more you want and the less you can afford or actually have, the more you suffer. Unless you’re a gazillionaire or a lucky bastard, chances are there’s a mountain of stuff that you want but can’t have. You can probably easily list a hundred, if not hundreds of things that you want but cannot have. Check your Amazon.com wish list, and you’ll see what I mean.

Imagine thinking about all those things or having those things occupying the back of your mind. Because that’s what we do, either consciously or subconsciously. We do this all the time. For the vast majority of us, it consumes our life, the yearning, longing, wanting. For many of us, it becomes our life.

And that’s where the term “Life is suffering” comes from.

What’s the antidote? Easy. Just don’t want it. And this is where The Four Noble Truths come in.

(This is also why Buddhism is bad for the economy. I’ll explain later.)

The First Noble Truth tells us that we should first accept the fact that, yeah, we’re suffering like hell because we want sooo much and we can’t friggin’ have it! Just face it, suck it up and admit it. Yeah, I want to look like Brad Pitt and marry Angelina Jolie, drive a Ferrari, live in Malibu, have a Swiss bank account, kick ass like Matt Damon in Bourne Identity, never have cancer, never have anyone die in my life, never see my stocks take a dive, never, never, never…

Okay, now that I’ve admitted that I want everything, I must realize that for each of these things that I want but cannot have, I hurt. Even if each want hurts just a little bit, a hundred or hundreds of these little hurts start adding up to one big-ass HURT. What I have to do is identify each hurt, identify each of the things that causes me suffering. This is the Second Noble Truth, to figure out what the heck is making me hurt. Mainly, it has to do with what I want, what I cling to. That includes my ego.

My ego is that part of me that gets hurt whenever somebody doesn’t like my haircut, or doesn’t agree with my taste in clothes, or says that I should be making more money, or doesn’t think my car is a good enough car. My ego is that part of me that puts some people above other people, and puts some people below other people, in terms of status or importance. My ego is that part of me that makes me delusional.

The Third Noble Truth is to realize that WE ARE NOT STUCK. There is a way out of this. There is a way to get rid of the ego. Repeat after me: “There is a way out of this, there is a way out of this, there’s no place like home, there’s no place like home…”

The Fourth Noble Truth is to figure out how not to be stuck. That includes getting rid of the ego (or at least controlling it as much as possible), not clinging to so many things, not repeating the same mistakes that got us in trouble in the first place, not caring about what others think about my haircut, etc.

If we un-stuck ourselves, we end our suffering. That’s when we become happy. We don’t want anything, we don’t need anything, and we are happy.

Now, think about this. If we really did get rid of our egos, and not care about what others think about our haircuts or the cars we drive, how would we know what to buy, except for essential stuff like water, vienna sausages and toilet paper?

This is why Buddhism is bad for the economy. If we figure out that we really don’t need anything to be truly happy, we’ll stop buying stuff. We’ll realize that one car is good enough, that we don’t need that “weekend” car. We won’t need that extra “showroom” bathroom. We’ll start buying coffee at 7-11 again.

You know what, on second thought, never mind any of this. Forget everything that you’ve just read. We don’t need this kind of anti-consumer thinking, especially with the economy already sucking the way it is. We need to boost the economy. Please continue to want stuff, buy stuff, need stuff. Most importantly, don’t forget to update your web sites. If your web sites are outdated (or God forbid you don’t even have a web site!), your friends won’t like you anymore, and you will be miserable.

*Why didn't I just title this entry "The Four Noble Truths"? Because many of you probably wouldn't have read all the way here unless I threw in an insult and an exclamation mark.

..

More info on The Four Noble Truths from Wikipedia. Reading a book also helps.

Another one: The Four Noble Truths Study Guide



Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Ideal Career, Birth Order Predictor, new Dalai Lama book

Two quiz links from my cousins:

From What's Your Ideal Career?
http://www.blogthings.com/idealcareerquiz/

My result:

***Your Career Type: Investigative***

You are precise, scientific, and intellectual.Your talents lie in understanding and solving math and science problems.

You would make an excellent:

Architect - Biologist - Chemist - Dentist - Electrical Technician - Mathematician - Medical Technician - Meteorologist - Pharmacist - Physician - Surveyor - Veterinarian

The worst career options for your are enterprising careers, like lawyer or real estate agent.

..

From The Birth Order Predictor
http://www.blogthings.com/birthorderpredictorquiz/

***You Are Likely an Only Child***

At your darkest moments, you feel frustrated. At work and school, you do best when you're organizing. When you love someone, you tend to worry about them. In friendship, you are emotional and sympathetic. Your ideal careers are: radio announcer, finance, teaching, ministry, and management. You will leave your mark on the world with organizational leadership, maybe as the author of self-help books.

Spot on. That's kinda creepy.

..

That reminds me, new book from a Golden Child:

The Universe in a Single Atom, by the Dalai Lama



Saturday, September 17, 2005

GIGO and Books in My Bedroom

GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out) is a term in computer programming, where the quality of the product will only be as good/effective as the inputted code.

It's the same with Buddhism, where Karma is the evolutionary result of an intentional act. Positive intentions and positive acts will yield positive results. On the other hand, negative intentions and negative acts will yield negative results. Garbage in, garbage out.


Books in My Bedroom Bookshelf

Top shelf
  • The Art of Happiness, H.H. Dalai Lama (H.H. means His Holiness)
  • Live in a Better Way, H.H. Dalai Lama
  • The Path to Tranquility, H.H. Dalai Lama
  • Imagine All the People, H.H. Dalai Lama
  • An Open Heart, H.H. Dalai Lama
  • Healing Anger: The Power of Patience from a Buddhist Perspective, H.H. Dalai Lama
  • The World of Tibetan Buddhism, H.H. Dalai Lama
  • The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, Sogyal Rinpoche
  • Freedom in Exile: The Autobiography of the Dalai Lama
  • The Vision of the Buddha, Tom Lowenstein
  • Zen Essence: The Science of Freedom, Thomas Cleary
  • The Five Houses of Zen, Thomas Cleary
  • Zen and the Sutras, Albert Low
  • The Shambhala Dictionary of Buddhism and Zen
  • Buddhism Plain and Simple, Steve Hagen
  • Ethics for the New Millennium, H.H. Dalai Lama
  • In Exile from the Land of Snows, John Avedon
  • Call Me By My True Names: The Collected Poems of Thich Nhat Hanh
  • Living Buddha, Living Christ, Thich Nhat Hanh
  • Teachings on Love, Thich Nhat Hanh
  • Meditation in Action, Chogyam Trungpa
  • Symbols of Tibetan Buddhism, Claude Levenson
  • Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching, translated by Ursula Le Guin
  • Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching, translated by D.C. Lau
  • The Tao of Inner Peace, Diane Dreher
  • Every Day Tao, Leonard Willoughby
  • The Dragon Who Never Sleeps, Robert Aitken
  • Living a Good Life, Thomas Cleary
  • The Tao of Physics, Fritjof Capra

2nd Shelf

  • Complete Works of Shakespeare
  • A Brief History of Time, Stephen Hawking
  • In My Own Words, Mother Teresa
  • Learn to Read Music, Harry & Michael Baxter
  • The Lord of the Rings and Philosophy, Gregory Bassham and Eric Bronson
  • The Essential Rilke, Rainer Maria Rilke
  • Tantric Quest, Daniel Odier
  • Siddhartha, Hermann Hesse
  • The Ecology of Commerce, Paul Hawken
  • 365 Zen, Jean Smith
  • Essential Zen, Kazuaki Tanahashi and Tensho David Schneider
  • The Elements of Zen, David Scott and Tony Doubleday
  • Zen: The Path of Paradox, Osho
  • The Little Zen Companion, David Schiller
  • The Religions of Man, Huston Smith
  • The Wisdom of the Sufi Sages, Timothy Freke
  • Essential Sufism, James Fadiman and Robert Frager
  • Anyway: The Paradoxical Commandments, Kent Keith
  • The Dharma of Star Wars, Matthew Bortolin
  • Moving Forward, Keeping Still, Ariel Books
  • The Art of War, Sun Tzu
  • The Book of Five Rings, Miyamoto Musashi
  • The Power of Myth, Joseph Campbell
  • An Open Life, Joseph Campbell
  • The Joseph Campbell Companion, Diane Osbon
  • The Hero With A Thousand Faces, Joseph Campbell

3rd Shelf

  • Thomas Jefferson, Willard Randall
  • Encyclopedia of Catholicism, Richard McBrien
  • The Bridge Across Forever, Richard Bach
  • Illusions, Richard Bach
  • Jonathan Livingston Seagull, Richard Bach
  • Selected Poems, Rita Dove
  • How to Think Like Leonardo da Vinci, Michael Gelb
  • Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
  • The Tao of Pooh, Benjamin Hoff
  • On Writing Well, William Zinsser
  • Letters, Principal Doctrines and Vatican Sayings, Epicurus
  • Epictetus: The Art of Living, Sharon Levell
  • The Dancing Wu Li Masters, Gary Zukav
  • The Elements of Feng Shui, Man-Ho Kwok and Joanne O'Brien
  • The Western Guide to Feng Shui, Terah Collins
  • Taming the Tiger, Witold Rybczynski
  • The Elegant Universe, Brian Greene
  • The Fabric of the Cosmos, Brian Greene
  • How Rembrandt Reveals Your Beautiful Imperfect Self, Roger Housden
  • The Mastery of Love, Don Miguel Ruiz
  • The Four Agreements, Don Miguel Ruiz
  • Shiatsu: Japanese Finger Pressure Therapy, Tokujiro Namikoshi
  • The Handy Religion Answer Book, John Renard
  • Complete Idiot's Guide to World Religions, Brandon Toropov and Luke Buckles
  • Complete Idiot's Guide to Philosophy, Jay Stevenson

Those are the top three shelves. Three more shelves to list in the next entry...




Time Standing Still

From the Wikipedia page on Siddhartha Gautama:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gautama_Buddha

"Then he remembered a moment in childhood in which he had been watching his father start the season's plowing, and he had fallen into a naturally concentrated and focused state in which time seemed to stand still, and which was blissful and refreshing."

Why are moments of revelation often described as "time standing still"?

If time were to actually stand still for everyone, would we experience constant revelation?



Friday, September 16, 2005

The Spiritual Glass Ceiling

Something I noticed about Christianity as compared to Buddhism:

In Christianity, a person can never, ever, ever, never, ever, be 100% good. We can be, like, 99.999% good, but not all the way. We (Christians and Catholics) are taught from birth that we have that Original Sin, that we're inherently flawed, and we just gotta live with it. Catholics go to confession because they are always sinning, that somebody always did some kind of sinning somewhere, and not a week goes by where somebody did no sinning. If there was only one constant in Catholicism, it's sinning.

(This is where it gets really blasphemous.)

Regarding God: He is like the president of the company, that 100% shareholder, but the difference is the highest position any employee can reach is vice president, unless that position is held by Jesus, which leaves the rest of us with managerial positions. No matter how much we try or learn or do, the best we can be are managers who have to go to confession every week.

Now, Buddhism. Buddhism started because some guy, Siddharta Gautama, discovered enlightenment and the path to enlightenment. In Buddhism, anyone can be a buddha (enlightened one). You can be any gender, age, ethnicity, profession, and you can even have a sucky past, but if you started today you still have a chance to be a buddha. It supposedly takes a long long long time, aeons even, but at least there is a chance that anyone can be a buddha.

Here's Wikipedia's entry on buddha

Starting today, if I'm good and patient and think things through and am very aware of what I'm doing all the time and try to help people live better lives, there's a good chance that someday I'll reach buddhahood.

Starting today, if I'm good and patient and think things through and am very aware of what I'm doing all the time and try to help people live better lives, I'll still have to go to confession. And there's absolutely nothing I can do to totally clear my record. Even if I spent the last week stuck at home and delirious with the flu, this week I'll still have to go to confession. The way I see it, if I have to go to confession, and if I don't have any sins, I'm gonna have to make some up just to make the visit worth it. And that would be lying. Shit.



Wednesday, September 14, 2005

New, Improved Enlightenment version 2.0

From The Four Noble Truths DVD with the Dalai Lama

Question from audience:

"Could you advise a layperson with a home, family and work demands how to develop a systematic pattern of practice?"

Dalai Lama:

"To a serious practitioner, the most serious effort is very necessary. Without that, just a short prayer, some chanting, or a recitation with the mala beads, is not sufficient, cannot change your mind. Our negative emotions, I think, are so powerful, that in order to challenge that, we need constant effort. Through that way, yes, I think we can definitely change.

But usually, my western friends request the quickest, and easiest, and most effective, way. Then also perhaps, another question perhaps--the cheapest! I think that's impossible! I...I usually feel that is a sign of failure! Hahaha..."



Tuesday, September 13, 2005

Things I Have Said During Random Conversations

Is it that hard to be a decent human being?

Where can I get some water?

Why did you buy that?

Elbow pads and a helmet? Can't we just go get a ball, go into the street and play right now?

I just want to write a letter. How can I just write a letter?

Do you have water?

Why isn't your truckbed large enough to carry drywall?

If I don't need bleach, why do I have to use bleach?

But my cellphone already has a clock on it.

Why would I want that in my life?

Horror movies make me not feel good so I don't watch them.

But these pants are comfortable and stretchy. If my pants are comfortable, there's a better chance that I will like you better because I'm happier. And then we can have better conversation.

Do you want my DVD player? I have one too many.

Even if I'm at the beach, if it's too warm I'll turn on the air conditioner.

I stop reading when I fall asleep and wake up for the third time. Then I put the book away, turn off the light and pass out.



Monday, September 12, 2005

Karma

There are many definitions for "karma" on the Internet, many of them very confusing. Here's the easiest to understand for me, from the DVD Four Noble Truths with the Dalai Lama.

"Karma is mistakenly understood in the west as almost identical to the western notion of destiny or fate. Most people think it's responsible for what happens to them. They say 'It's my karma', or 'it's my fate'.

But the buddhist idea is somewhat different. The central notion about karma in buddhism is that it is the evolutionary result of an intentional act. Whatever we do with intention has an evolutionary impact on us."

Karma is the evolutionary result of an intentional act.

Intention, action, result.

We are all accountable.


---


Really cool interview with the Dalai Lama:
http://www.readersdigest.ca/mag/2004/05/dalai_lama.html



Saturday, September 10, 2005

Misknowledge and the Continued War on Ignorance

Yet one more supportive reason why I hate the hell out of ignorance:

misknowledge

(In Sanskrit avidya) Ignorance as active wrong knowing 'misperception or misconception' rather than mere failure to know. Such deliberate ignorance is the root of the samsaric life cycle the primary cause of all suffering.

http://www.asiasource.org/reference/display.cfm?wordid=1664

Here's a passage from the book World of Tibetan Buddhism, page 37:

The second seal states that all contaminated phenomena are, by nature, unsatisfactory. In this context, contaminated phenomena refers to all things, events, experiences, and so forth, that are products of contaminated actions and the underlying delusions that give rise to them. As explained earlier, anything that is produced is other-powered, in the sense that it is under the control of factors other than itself--for example, its causes and conditions. Here, causes specifically refers to our own fundamental ignorance, afflictive emotions and cognitive events, and contaminated actions. Also, ignorance must not be perceived as a passive state of mere non-awareness; rather, it is a deluded state of mind, a fundamental misapprehension of the nature of reality. This is clearly stated by various Indian masters, such as Dharmakirti and Vasubandhu. Vasubandhu tells us in his Abhidharmakosa (Treasury of Knowledge) that ignorance is not simply the absence of knowledge but rather it is the antithesis of knowledge; it is misknowledge, a force actively opposing knowledge, as hostility opposes friendliness and falsehood opposes truth.

..

"Confusion is the same as ignorance." -- 14th Dalai Lama



Turning Left, I Saw Electrons

I was waiting to turn left at an intersection, waiting for a car coming in the opposite direction, toward me, to pass me. And then I thought about the dimension of time, the equation for calculating distance (velocity multiplied by time), and electrons as described in quantum theory.

Electrons are damn hard to measure, and even with the best measuring devices one can only guess as to where they are positioned at any given time.

Time. There’s that word again.

Anyway, look up “Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle” and you’ll get even more confused in terms of figuring out what an electron is and does.

Along with Time is the equation for calculating distance, which involves Time. How fast you go (velocity) multiplied by how much time you take, and you get distance. Easy enough. But apply this equation to electrons and it doesn’t really work. No matter what scientists do, they can’t seem to figure out where an electron will be at a given time. The sucker’s hard to pin down.

Why?

A lot of people have theories, so I’ll propose mine. I’m cross-referencing some buddhist philosophy to quantum theory, and throwing an idea out there. Here’s a passage from the Dalai Lama’s World of Tibetan Buddhism book:

We find that between the past and the future there is an extremely thin line—something that cannot really withstand analysis and remain as the present. If we were to maintain a single point in time as indivisible, then there would be no grounds for dividing between the past, present, and future, because it would all be indivisible. But when we speak of divisible time, then there is hardly any present remaining between the past and future. If the present cannot be posited, how can past and future be posited?

Whoah. Does that mean that time a) does not really exist, b) doesn’t have to exist, c) is one of our many many delusions?

Is this why it’s so hard to follow an electron? What if electrons exist outside of the limitations of our world? What if electrons don’t give a shit about time, and they’re off doing their own thing, jumping in and out of different dimensions?

If this is true, is it possible for me to make that left turn EXACTLY as that other car is crossing the intersection, as long as time were not a factor? If time were not a factor, could things exist in the same space at the same time, like my car and that other car, without our airbags exploding and our insurance premiums getting adjusted?

Is this why the Dalai Lama likes to collect watches?

http://www.tibet.ca/en/wtnarchive/1999/10/24_1.html

As a good Buddhist, he is not supposed to become attached to worldly possessions; yet he is hopelessly enamored of his collection of wristwatches. His fascination with watches is an endless source of annoyance to him, a sign of his imperfection.